Connect with us


The One China Policy And How Trump Angered China

In 1992, China’s People’s Republic of China and Taiwan’s Republic of China framed The One China Policy. Video illustrates the sequence of events that led to strained Sino – Taiwan relations and explains the consequence of the recent steps taken by US President Donald Trump.



Japan had ruled over modern day China, including Taiwan, for over a millennium and were finally overthrown in 1912 during the first Sino-Japanese War, giving rise to the Republic of China.


Sun Yat-Sen was the president of the Republic of China at the time, but couldn’t manage to seize power as the military forces had sworn allegiance to another… a man by the name of Yuan. Yuan had led the military forces in their victory against the Japanese and enjoyed their unwavering support. Without the military to give him credibility, Sun eventually had to flee and seek shelter in Japan.

As fate would have it, Yuan died a year later, plunging China into a state of chaos and disarray. There was a power struggle that ensued amongst the warlords, fragmenting the nation and making it weak. Taking advantage of this, Sun returned to China and established the political party Koumintang with help from the soviets. In return the soviets demanded something, a favour… a favour that would eventually be the turning point in this tale.  The Russians asked him to ally with a very small party at the time – the Communist Party of China.

The Koumintang alliance was so strong, they managed to overthrow the warlord factions and seize control over the nation but not without cost. Sun died in 1927 and after his death, Koumintang split into two factions, the right wing nationalists and the extreme left Communists. Since the Koumintang were a nationalist body to begin with, they still held more power. They executed thousands’ of communists, eventually earning the wrath of the Russians, leading to the Chinese Civil war. With Russian support, the Communists eventually managed to take control of the Chinese Mainland forcing the Nationalists to flee to Taiwan.

The nationalists however did not relinquish power and continued to run the nation from Taiwan under the name of the Republic of China (the ROC). While the communists established power in the mainland and called themselves People’s Republic of China or the PRC.

Here is where the issue begins. Both nations began to identify themselves to the outside world as being “the real China.” So which exactly is the real China? The UN passed a resolution in 1979 agreeing to recognize the PRC as the official government of China, since China is a permanent member of the UN Security Council and having representatives from 2 nations proved to be a major challenge.

In 1992, the leaders of both sides finally met and framed “The One China Policy.” The policy states that, in spite of having 2 separate governments, there can and will only be “One China”. So what this means is that any nation wishing to have diplomatic ties with the PRC must first break all ties with the ROC and vice versa.

Koumintang lost the Taiwanese elections for the first time in 2002 and since then, The Democratic Progressive Party have been in power, The DPP does not agree with the One china policy, and wants Taiwan to be an independent nation. The PRC, on the other hand believes Taiwan to be an integral and inseparable part of China, and China would be willing to do all in its power, using military might if need be, to prevent them from seceding.

This is the reason Donald Trump was criticized by the PRC, for having allowed a Taiwanese delegation to be a part of the presidential inauguration ceremony, with complete disregard for the One China Policy.

Continue Reading
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. 94Lisa

    August 5, 2017 at 12:24 pm

    Hello blogger, i must say you have high quality articles here.
    Your page can go viral. You need initial traffic only.
    How to get it? Search for; Mertiso’s tips go viral

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


What is Brexit and Article 50?




On June 2016, the Prime Minister David Cameron called out to all citizens in the UK to cast their vote.  This wasn’t an electoral vote, but rather an opinion poll on whether the UK should continue with, or secede from the EU. He was confident that the citizens would not want to secede, But was let down. The United Kingdom created history that day, with close to 52% of people voting in favor of leaving the EU.

David Cameron resigned as Prime Minister the day after the results were announced. Theresa May took his place and has promised to invoke article 50 before April 2017. Article 50 is a formal notification of the intent to separate from the EU, along with complete guidelines on how to do so.

Once invoked, terms such as future trade relations with the EU will be discussed. The process is supposed to take a maximum of 2 years. This is the first time a member nation will invoke article 50 and hence the road ahead is very unclear. Once invoked, there is no going back.


The government were on the path to trigger article 50, but a recent Supreme Court ruling has stated that they need to get the bill approved by parliament first. The Members of Parliament are under tremendous pressure as they have been given just 5 days to decide on it.

So why did people vote this way?

Firstly, people in Britain felt, that their leaders were having lesser and lesser say when it came to defending national law at the European level. In their eyes, the EU was an agent of change that was dismissive of their way of life and public opinion.

Secondly, they were very concerned about restrictions placed on them due to European immigration laws. The UK government had proposed that people coming in from other parts of the EU must live in the UK and contribute to it for at least 4 years before they get access to social housing and other benefits. This was opposed by the EU, making many wonder why the EU has this much say in Britain’s social welfare?

Thirdly, as laid down by the EU, all member countries are expected to adopt the Euro latest by 2020. Many felt that they were being forced to abandon the Pound and adopt the Euro against their wishes. They have been sceptical about this, as the Pound has always been the stronger currency and they believe the Euro to be unstable as it can be influenced by economically weaker countries such as Greece.

Fourthly, people feel that being a part of the EU is costing the country billions of dollars a year. The free trade agreements it enjoys are not enough to offset this cost. They would rather be an independent nation and have the complete freedom to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU as well such as China and India.

The vote shows how divided Britain was on the issue and the bill, if passed, would be the start of a new era in European politics.


Continue Reading


How Powerfull is the President of United States – Donald Trump’s Executive Order




Creating huge waves his first week in office, Donald Trump has signed an executive order barring individuals of 7 nations from entering the US. Individuals from Muslim majority nations of Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen have been denied entry into the US for a period of 90 days with immediate effect, until stronger laws are put in place. The individuals exempt from the ban are Diplomats, UN officials and in certain cases, those of minority faith, such as persecuted Christians, making many believe this to be a “Muslim ban”.  Trump has denied the claims, stating that the order was passed to combat terrorism in order to keep the US safe and is in no way anti-Muslim.

The executive order also puts a stop to the US immigration program for 120 days, and halts Syrian refugees from entering the nation indefinitely. This comes at a time when the world faces its greatest refugee crisis since the Second World War.

The power to issue an “Executive order” is a special right enjoyed by the president of the United States. With the exception of William Henry Harrison, all presidents, including George Washington, have at some time during their tenure, issued executive orders.

One of the most famous executive orders in history was the Emancipation Proclamation, issued by President Abraham Lincoln, in 1863 which changed the status of 3 million human beings from “slave to free.”

A questionable use of the power was seen when President Ford granted a full pardon to President Nixon for any offenses he might have committed during his presidency. Former President Barack Obama issued 276 executive orders on immigration, climate change, gun control, contraception and even gay rights.

But the power to issue these orders does not give the president the right to make law and can be struck down by either Congress or the Supreme Court of America at any time.

By issuing such an order, Trump believes he is putting “America First” but such an approach shows an eerie similarity with the “America first” movement during the Second World War.

America was against getting involved in the war and as a result of this they infamously turned away the St Lewis in 1939. The ship was carrying 937 Jewish refugees who were looking to escape Hitler’s persecution. The ship was turned away from American shores; ultimately leading to 100’s being killed in the holocaust. Since then, the US has come a long way in their refugee program. 85000 refugees were allowed into the country last year, with a majority of them coming from Syria and Iraq.

Numerous protests have spread across the nation since, with people demanding Trump to reconsider his stance.

Will the Trump administration give in to the pressure, or will we witness the rise of a new America, the likes of which we haven’t seen in a long time.

Continue Reading


Everything you need to know about the India China Conflict at Doklam




India and China are currently facing off at Doka La close to a disputed tri-junticon between 3 nations – India, China and Bhutan in a border issue that has its roots as far back as 1890. Read further to understand what is going on and the future outcome of the stand-off.


For close to 5 weeks, India and China have been involved in a stand-off along part of their shared border. To better understand what is going let’s take you back in time.

In the early 18th century, the British Empire worked towards improving its trade routes from India into Tibet in order to sell tea, tobacco and other foods produced by Indian colonies. Sikkim, then an independent Kingdom was the ideal connecting point. As a result, the northern part of the kingdom was annexed by Britain in 1888. 2 years later, Britain and China met in Calcutta in order to clearly define the Sikkim-Tibet border to avoid any future conflict.


British India captures North Sikkim

The treaty of 1890 was signed between the two sides.

Article 1 of this treaty states that the border begins at Mt Gipmochi while at the same time also states that the boundary must follow the watershed. Mt Gipmochi, however, is not the start of the watershed and the treaty does not explain how to interpret this.


Mount Gipmochi and the watershed line

In discussions, China quotes the 1890 treaty and chooses the starting point of the border as Mt. Gipmochi while Bhutan and India choose Batang La as the starting point.

Once India gained independence, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru had written to his Chinese counterpart Zhou Enlai in 1959. In the letter, Mr Nehru agreed that there is no dispute over the boundary between Sikkim and Tibet, however with regards to the border between Bhutan and Tibet, he states that Chinese maps show sizable areas of Bhutan as part of Tibet and had requested that the same be rectified by Chinese authorities.


The disputed area

However, whether the border starts at Batang LA or Gipmochi would not change Indian territory in any way. So why is India involved in the issue?

Bhutan was not a party to the 1890 agreement and its border with Tibet, has never been officially demarcated. Bhutan asserts that the disputed area is Bhutanese territory. In 1998, China and Bhutan signed a bilateral agreement for maintaining status quo and peace on the border. China agreed to show respect for Bhutan’s sovereignty in the region and build ties peacefully. However, Bhutan claims that China’s building of roads on the disputed land is in violation of the 1998 agreement, and has provoked tensions. China on the other hand claims that the road building exercise is peaceful and should not warrant such a reaction.

India and Bhutan have been closely allied since 1949 and until 2007 India maintained a significant influence over Bhutan’s foreign policy and defense. Prior to 1970, India represented Bhutan in all border talks with China. Recently, China attempted to extend a road in a sector of Doklam triggering the stand-off. Coming to Bhutan’s aid, Indian forces crossed over the border taking up positions at Doka La in order to block any further road construction in the disputed area. Another important concern that may have prompted India to make such a move is the strategically important Chicken’s neck. Merely 130 kilometers south of Doka La lies an area known as the Chicken’s neck or the Siliguri corridor which is of extreme strategic importance to India.


Chicken’s neck

The Chicken’s neck is an outcome of the British decolonization process. The creation of East Pakistan (which became Bangladesh in 1971) led to the birth of this awkward piece of geography which is of extreme strategic importance to India. A Chinese military advance of less than 80 miles south could cut off Bhutan, part of West Bengal and all of North-East India, from the rest of the country. Currently, India and China are using all available diplomatic channels to avoid escalating the issue. An ego clash seems to have ensued with both sides refusing to budge. Hopefully, the two Asian Giants would be able to reach a consensus soon, or as they say “winter is coming, and once it hits, both sides would have no option but to withdraw considering the extreme weather conditions prevalent in the area”.

Continue Reading

Search Topic